Much like this summer, Phish had taken some time to prepare new material ahead of their 1998 summer tour. The new songs would ultimately end up on The Story Of The Ghost, and a tour through Europe would prove the ultimate testing grounds for these new gems. Not only did Phish bring out three brand new songs for the fans who made it to the tour opener in Copenhagen, but they treated fans to a great show in the process.Opening with “Limb by Limb” and “Ghost,” Phish treated fans to an alternate version of their classic tune “Water in the Sky” in the first set. You can hear the excitement at the new interpretation! There was an air of excitement for the first-ever “Roggae” too, a song that would become a staple of live shows. The band also turned a 1997 funk jam into “The Moma Dance,” with Trey Anastasio even going so far as to teach fans the now-forgotten dance that accompanies. After a great second set, the band brought out one more new song, “Brian and Robert,” for the encore.Listen to the full audio of the show, courtesy of fromtheaquarium.You can see the phish.net setlist below.Setlist: Phish at The Grey Hall, Freetown Christiania, Copenhagen, Denmark – 06/30/1998 Set 1: Limb By Limb, Ghost, Water in the Sky > Bouncing Around the Room, Tube, Stash -> Cities, Roggae, Guyute, Beauty of My Dreams > Funky Bitch, Train Song, David BowieSet 2: The Moma Dance, Birds of a Feather, Wolfman’s Brother -> Frankie Says > Run Like an Antelope, Lawn Boy, Ya Mar, Ha Ha Ha, Mike’s Song -> Swept Away > Steep > Weekapaug GrooveEncore: Brian and Robert Debut of “new” faster arrangement. Debut.Notes: This show marked the debuts of Roggae, The Moma Dance, Brian and Robert, and the “new” faster arrangement of Water in the Sky. Ghost included a San-Ho-Zay tease from Trey. Tube contained a Sand tease. The Moma Dance included the band teaching the audience the simplistic “dance” that accompanies the song.
One Twitter user wrote: “Those weird triangle things look like part of a factory floor.” And a final Arsenal fan commented: “Is it run over by a lorry?” Adidas threw it back to the early 1990s with their yellow away shirt for the Gunners this term Promoted ContentThe Very Last Bitcoin Will Be Mined Around 2140. Read MoreWhich Country Is The Most Romantic In The World?7 Ways To Understand Your Girlfriend Better8 Best 1980s High Tech Gadgets6 Ridiculous Health Myths That Are Actually TrueWho Is The Most Powerful Woman On Earth?10 Risky Jobs Some Women Do27 Animals That Don’t Need Color To Be Cool6 Extreme Facts About HurricanesPlaying Games For Hours Can Do This To Your BodyThe 10 Best Secondary Education Systems In The World7 Black Hole Facts That Will Change Your View Of The Universe Loading… FacebookTwitterWhatsAppEmail分享 Read Also: Pogba makes coronavirus fund-raising pledge However, a few were far more complimentary and replied: “Take my money.” One supporter shared two black concept away kits in response which were far more popular. The first had red accent and featured a lightning-bolt effect on the front while the second used the yellow to compliment the black and went with the retro triangle shapes. A new Arsenal concept kit has been branded “disgusting” and “awful” on social media as fans begin to look ahead to the 2020/21 season. The Gunners switched back to Adidas at the beginning of the current campaign, replacing Puma. Arsenal fans did not approve of the new concept kit shared on Twitter And the German manufacturers dropped two strips, with the yellow away jersey reminiscent of the famous ‘bruised banana’ shirt from 1991 to 1993 and hugely popular but the home shirt receiving a mixed reaction. But one potential home shirt for the next campaign, again designed by Adidas who have a five-year contract at the Emirates, did not go down well with supporters. It featured the traditional red front but with a white sleeve and upper across the top and a V-neck collar. The traditional three stripes are over the right shoulder and the jersey features a series of triangles which are used to form bizarre stripes. This season’s home shirt received a mixed reaction from supporters when it was released last year But supporters on Twitter did not take kindly to the possible design. One labelled it “awful” while another used the word “monstrosity” to describe it and a third went with “ugly”. Another said: “Absolutely disgusting, it’s as though we went back to Puma.”