Director of Public Information blasted for ‘distasteful’ statement

first_imgPIO MPs India conference– Resident Indian High Commissioner fires backDirector of Public Information at the Office of the Prime Minister, Imran Khan, has been upbraided for what was described as a ‘distasteful’ comment directed at the resident Indian High Commissioner to Guyana, His Excellency Mr Mahalingam Venkatachalam, regarding the selection of Members of Parliament for a conference in India.Khan, a member of the Alliance for Change (AFC) component of the Coalition APNU-AFC Administration, took to social media to call out High Commissioner Venkatachalam on the issue of several sitting MPs of Indian origin – from both the Government and parliamentary Opposition benches — attending the first-ever PIO (Person of Indian Origin) Parliamentarian Conference in India.“Something smells. And it ain’t parfum. Is the Indian High Commission in Guyana interfering in Guyana’s internal affairs and attempting to engage in destabilisation of the Coalition Government?” Khan questioned, while tagging the Indian diplomat in his personalised comment.Director of Public Information, Imran KhanKhan went a bit further, asking whether any of the Indo-Guyanese ministers of Government and sitting MPs were invited to the conference currently ongoing in India? “Or did the High Commission only and deliberately invite three Coalition Government backbench parliamentarians while specifically ignoring ministers? If so, on what basis was this decision made?” Khan further questioned.Khan also questioned whether it was true that 23 Guyanese MPs were invited in this regard, and that 20 of the invitees are Peoples Progressive Party (PPP) MPs while a mere three are Government MPs.While there were several arguments pertaining to whether Khan should be asking these questions, or whether it was a direct attack on the Indian High Commissioner, several people found it strange that Khan, a public office bearer, would raise these concerns with a foreign mission in such a forum.Public Health Minister Volda Lawrence also took umbrage at the statement made by Khan, and expressed her displeasure by saying, “Imran Khan, this is distasteful and not in keeping with how this Government treats their guests. Please remove this post.”Venkatachalam, on the other hand, later responded to the post by stating that many persons in the top hierarchy of the Guyana Government and the Guyana High Commission in New Delhi are aware of the invitations from the Government of India for 23 MPs and 3 Mayors of Guyana, and of the rationale behind inviting only those Persons of Indian Origin MPs who are not Ministers.“Hence reckless comments on such a serious issue on social media with the clear intention to mislead the general public by none other than Director of Public Information is unfortunate, irresponsible, unprofessional; and to say the least, mischievous, given the excellent bilateral relations being enjoyed by both India and Guyana and the ongoing friendly cooperation in various multilateral fora,” the High Commissioner chided.Meanwhile, in response to posts on social media and in sections of the mainstream media criticising the PPP for sending a total of 17 Parliamentarians to a conference in India, Opposition Chief Whip Gail Teixeira responded that her party had received invitations and accepted them. She claimed that soon after, in December, preparations were put in place for the selected individuals to attend the event, which is being hosted by India. This, she said, affected the attendance of those Opposition MPs in Parliament on Wednesday.The Opposition Chief Whip also rebuffed criticisms at the selection of Opposition Parliamentarian Clement Rohee to form part of the delegation attending the conference. She said Rohee is of Indian origin, as his name suggests, and his parentage background is also Indian.Among the Guyana delegation to attend the conference are three MPs from the Coalition Government and three mayors. The trip is being funded by the Indian Government.The PPP delegation is led by Opposition Leader Bharrat Jagdeo, and includes Clement Rohee, Irfaan Ali, Anil Nandlall, Dr. Frank Anthony, Dharamkumar Seeraj, Dr. Vindhya Persaud, Indranie Chandarpal, Colin Croal, Dr Bheri Ramsarran, Zulfikar Mustapha, Ganga Persaud, Neendkumar, Dr. Vishwa Mahadeo, Nigel Dharamlall, Bhagmattie Veerasammy and Vickram Bharrat.The coalition members are Rajcoomarie Bancroft, Charrandass Persaud and Haimraj Rajkumar. Corriverton Mayor Krishnand Jaichand, Anna Regina Mayor Rabindranauth Mohan and Rose Hall Town Mayor Vijay Ramoo are also in attendance at the conference.A total of 141 public representatives from various countries participated in the conference, with some 124 MPs coming from the UK, Canada, Fiji, Kenya, Mauritius, New Zealand, Sri Lanka and other countries.The purpose of the conference was to help to establish a network with leaders of Indian origin in various countries, and get a feedback on the direction in which Indian engagement with the Diaspora should proceed. The trip is being funded by the Indian Government.last_img read more

OSB-Plant Shutdown Ends

first_imgThe one week shutdown at Canfor’s local Peace Valley OSB plant is over.The down time was part of a strategy to keep the plant afloat, by keeping productivity up and, it ended last night.Now, an industry analyst is suggesting forestry workers in BC should feel a little more comfortable, as lumber prices have started to recover.- Advertisement -Russ Taylor is with International Wood Products and he says, by cutting production, the industry has helped push prices about 25 percent above the lows experienced earlier this year…[asset|aid=150|format=mp3player|formatter=asset_bonus|title=Taylor-Lumber prices_1_Pub.mp3]Numbers recently reported by Credit Union Central show sawmill lumber production, from the start of 2008 to the end of May, has dropped by 24 percent in BC, as compared to the same period last year.Advertisementlast_img read more

Lighting firms flout e-waste rule in India, comply in EU

first_imgNew Delhi, Sep 19 (PTI) A green body today alleged that many international lighting firms which comply with the European countries rules on e-waste, refuse to accept responsibility for management of mercury-bearing waste mandated under Indias e-waste rules.Toxics Links alleged that while these firms have been fulfilling their commitments under the European Union directives while they dont do so in India.”This exposes their double standards and reflects that they have very little consideration for the adverse impacts of mercury on health of Indian citizens,” said Satish Sinha, Associate Director, Toxics Link.Naming some prominent lighting companies, the green body said they have refused to accept any responsibility for the management of mercury-bearing waste mandated under the new E-waste Rules, 2016.However, the same companies are responsible for management of mercury-bearing lamps in all the EU member states, it said.”It is ironical that they refuse to abide by similar rules in India and have challenged the governments notification by moving a petition in the Delhi High Court,” it said.The revised e-waste Rules have brought Compact Fluorescent Lamps and other mercury-containing lighting equipment under its ambit.It mandates that manufacturers have to take responsibility for the collection, transportation and disposal of fluorescent and other mercury-containing lamps under the EPR, one of the most progressive principles on e-waste management.It puts in place stringent provisions for violations.These companies are opposing the EPR principle by challenging it in the court, which is in stark contrast to their actions in Europe, the green body said.advertisementIt said that even the National Green Tribunal last year had instructed adoption of EPR for the management of mercury- bearing lights.”This is a significant move towards meeting Indias global commitment to reduce adverse impacts of mercury emissions and protect human health and environment. Allowing these companies to flout the rules in India will be a step back,” it said.Ravi Agarwal, Director, Toxics Link, termed it “unfortunate” that these firms are opposing EPR in India.”India is one of the biggest lighting markets of the world, perhaps larger than Europe. These companies have the experience of collecting and recycling mercury-bearing lights in an environmentally sound manner, which they have been doing in Europe for a long time.”Instead of opposing the Rules, they should come forward and set an example by setting up systems in India. This will not only help protect the environment, but will also create green jobs in the country,” Agarwal said. PTI TDS TIR SC TIRlast_img read more